“The budget will recommend tightening restrictions on eligibility for assistance programs — like food stamps — in an effort to increase the number of people
in the workforce and grow the economy. The SNAP program better known as food stamps is up for a $193 billion cut.
“We need people to go to work,” Mulvaney said. “If you’re on food stamps and you’re able bodied we need you to go to work. If you’re on disability insurance
and you’re not supposed to be — you’re not truly disabled — we need you to go to work. We need everybody pulling in the same direction.”
Could we get just one thing straight here? SNAP (food stamps) serves a large number of people who work; CHIP is for children of people who work and still live in poverty or near poverty.
Social Security Disability is based on earned income called quarters of coverage and is not all that easy to get on. Once enrolled, each beneficiary is re evaluated every other year, so staying on if not “truly disabled” is pretty difficult.
In short, the number of people who live in or near poverty in the United States WORK! … Or did: They’re retired and barely making it on Social Security Retirement Benefits. Many of these people get SNAP, Meals on Wheels ( another program Trump wants to eliminate) and Medicaid (Medicaid will pay the premium for Medicare if a person’s income is low enough.)
The notion that people receiving “food stamps” and other assistance are lounging around, sucking up benefits when they could be supporting themselves Is the unfortunate result of a propaganda campaign in the 1980’s to paint a picture of Welfare fraud that has never existed. Yes, there are people who take advantage of the system, but let’s not give them more clout or press than we have to. Instead, let them be dealt with according to the provisions in place.
I have known a lot of people who are enrolled in SNAP and/or other poverty relief programs. Of all of them, there are maybe 2 or three who were “mooching.” At that, there is something about these people that isn’t quite right…they never seem to get on their feet. I’m not sure I would want to kick them out of the system.
Defunding services most certainly is not the answer.
One idea I have: Hire people who live in or near poverty to work on a solution that works. The fat cats trying to make the policies don’t know what they’re talking about. Mulvaney and Trump are two great examples of that.
One more point about SNAP: The part that the Trump budget would eliminate is a provision that was included during this last recession. It allows people who live in parts of the US where unemployment is high to receive benefits. Many of these people are under employed or unable to find work, in spite of their efforts. If the Trump Administration wants to help, find ways to create jobs in these regions.